On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Michael Cocke wrote: > Can someone point me to a sa developer? We've been doing some hacking
For things like rule suggestions, we generally like people to goto http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ and open a ticket about it. That way there's tracking and such. > on SA at work (guardiandigital.com) and have a rule that we'd like to > get run against the corpus. It's not worth getting all set up as real FWIW, there isn't "the corpus", it's a bunch of personal corpora. > multipart related instead of the common way, but we're a little > concerned about false positives. I'm not sure what you mean by "the common way". If you want to send a text part with an image, it's "multipart/related". > header LOCAL_MULTIPART_RELATED Content-Type =~ /multipart\/related;/ Yeah, I did some work related to this when trying to clean up the EXTRA_MPART_TYPE rule. See https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5110 for that discussion. Someone else also suggested it in https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5224 There's also a number of tickets for FPs on image spams, since they're essentially being sent with Outlook, so genuine Outlook mails get flagged a lot, ie: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5226 All that said, the rule may work well for you, it really depends on the type of mails that you receive. For example, if it wasn't for my hamtraps, I wouldn't receive any legit mails that include pictures and could easily ignore the whole image spam thing with a simple MTA rule. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Senator Helms went on to say that President Clinton would need a bodyguard if he ever went to North Carolina. Helms later claimed that reporters misunderstood him through his hood." - Dennis Miller, Dennis Miller Live (1994, Jerry Seinfeld)
pgpHSCcO35fYI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
