On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 01:29:22PM +0100, J. W. Andersen wrote: > which did not hit the spam score. In either case the header is somewhat > modified by amavis, > but they still look OK to me, as far as I understand RFC2822.
As long as it's still in the proper rfc-related format it's fine. > Is there a way to capture or freeze the message file at the moment it is > passed to SA ? You could write a plugin to do this for you, but there's no standard feature that would do it, especially since you're using a third party daemon. > X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.751 tagged_above=3 required=6.3 tests=[AWL=1.774, > HEALTH_BDY=2.5, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.345, NO_RECEIVED=-0.001, > SPF_PASS=-0.001, TO_CC_NONE=0.134] [...] > Subject: health Hrm. Yeah, something is definitely messed up. It clearly has a Subject header and it works fine if I run it through "spamassassin": [21577] dbg: check: tests=BAYES_95,TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY [21577] dbg: check: subtests=__CT,__CTE,__CT_TEXT_PLAIN,__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__MIME_VERSION,__MOZILLA_MSGID,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__TOCC_EXISTS,__USER_AGENT -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do." - Henry Ford
pgpHlgxU5ypJe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
