John is absolutely correct here. Just be careful to ensure proper checking
of the 2nd octect of the 172.x.x.x space, and ensure that it is in the 16-31
range.  Otherwise you will be bypassing a very large chunk of AOL.com
address space without checks.

-----Original Message-----
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:49 PM
To: John Rudd
Cc: Jens Schleusener; Dimitri Yioulos; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Botnet-0.7 not working

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, John Rudd wrote:

> > is the causer since the test server receives the mails from a mail 
> > relay that uses a private 172.x.x.x address. Debug extract with the 
> > default configuration:
> 
> Is that a typo?  Did you mean 127.x.x.x?

Nope. 172.[16-31].x.x are reserved for uncoordinated private use the same
way 10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x are. See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1918.html

botnet should probably be ignoring them completely, just like is does
127.x.x.x

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Windows Vista: Windows ME for the XP generation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 13 days until Benjamin Franklin's 301st Birthday



Reply via email to