On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 11:16:43 +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks Ian, I didn't know rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net. I therefore added >rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org as I'm outside of Janet. > >This gives me for my postfix based installlation : > >reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, >reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org, >reject_rbl_client rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org, >reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, >reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net > >Thanks a lot. > >Ian Eiloart a écrit : >> >> >> --On 19 December 2006 18:01:31 +0100 Emmanuel Lesouef >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I was using it but with postfix checking sender restrictions. >>> >>> I think it is not used in SA but by mail servers. >>> >>> Anyone got a replacement ? >>> >> >> We've been using this list of RBLs: >> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org >> list.dsbl.org >> rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net >> relays.ordb.org >> >> In that order, and get just a few emails a day that get as far as the >> last check, with tens of thousands rejected by the earlier tests. >> I thought sbl-xbl used cbl as well? Is using them twice a waste of resource? Nigel
