On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:09:11PM -0600, Dave Richardson wrote: > intended effect? I have ZERO (none, nil) instances where header shows > "autolearn=" as any other value than "autolearn=no". This leads me > conclude that my sa-learn data is not being utilized by spamd?!
Define "utilized". scanning and learning are different things. > Is there a log or other way to peek into SA to have it tell me whether > it's got the sa-learn data in the bayes engine and IS USING THAT > INFORMATION? As with all things, run with -D. > sa-learn --dump magic > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version > 0.000 0 11737 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 23457 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 142588 0 non-token data: ntokens assuming this is the DB being accessed, it should be used for scanning. you'd see BAYES_* rule hits in the status header. > bayes_path /home/spamd/.spamassassin that's an invalid path, it needs a file prefix. -- Randomly Selected Tagline: "Today I set a motherboard on fire. Now the bizarre thing is that after the smoke cleared it still worked." - Alan Cox
pgppxY4dJl98X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
