Hi Stuart,

On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:56:25PM -0600, Stuart Johnston told us:
> I don't have a real answer except to say that I have the same problem 
> behind a PIX, so it is not just you.

nice to see I'm at least not the only person with this problem ;-)

I just took a look at pix NAT configuration (at the place I told
about we do NAT on the pix to the mail server on a dmz network).
The "static" command used for this on the pix takes an optional
argument, "norandomseq" which disables tcp ISN randomization,
which was a first suspect for p0f's behaviour on the inside...
unfortunately that wasn't it...googling for more information,
will come back when I have something new!!


Kind regards,

Sven

-- 
Linux zion.homelinux.com 2.6.18-1.2849.fc6xen #1 SMP Fri Nov 10 13:56:52 EST 
2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
 23:14:14 up 13 days, 32 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.03, 0.25, 0.36

Attachment: pgpStbuHJI48y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to