Matt Kettler wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Really in regexes there is no such thing as an AND operation. It's just
not something natural to do in a regex.
I would argue, at a deeper level of language/grammar theory, that this
isn't true. Instead, AND is implied by concatenation.
No it's not. Concatenation is order-specific. AND is order non-specific.
I'd have to break out a textbook (which means _find_ my textbooks on the
material) to continue the discussion meaningfully. I'm just glad anyone
at all replied to the question meaningfully :-}
