> I'd like something quasi-official if possible, so I can tell my
> bosses: according to this report, even with diligent spam filtering,
> xx% of the email people receive is still spam. If fewer than xx% of
> your email is spam, we're ahead of the curve.

I really don't have anything that measures the percentage of spam
received after filtering. The main reason for this is that it depends on
users to report it, and ours are notoriously unreliable in that regard.
Personally, I received 5 to 10 spam per week in my inboxes after
filtering. Generally the ones I receive are new forms of spam that SA
rules and DNSBLs haven't picked up on yet. Other that that, I can share
the overall daily stats I get. Sorry for the HTML posting, but the stats
come in a nice HTML table which just isn't so readable in text-only
mode. Note that the term "messages" is applied more generally here to
include both messages and connections that didn't result in messages
(blacklisting and greylisting).

E-mail SPAM Stats for 11/26/2006
Total messages attempted         23302   100%
E-mail accepted and delivered    1220    5.2%
SPAM, blocked or dropped         22082   94.8%
DNS Blacklists (zen.spamhaus.org & list.dsbl.org) and greylisting
Blocked by RBL   13692   58.8%
Blocked by greylisting   855     3.7%
Messages accepted (not blocked)  8755    37.6%
SpamAssassin Content Filter
Internal E-mail (not filtered)   395     4.5%
Classified as Real e-mail        825     9.4%
Classified as SPAM       7535    86.1%
Explanation: Messages arrive on our server from a variety of sources.
First a block list is applied to connections. This is done before the
e-mail is received reducing the time it takes to process messages that
are almost certainly spam. For the messages that are accepted, messages
that are from our internal network, or sent by users that first
authenticate to an account on our server, no further filtering is
applied. Other e-mail is sent to SpamAssassin to determine whether or
not it thinks the message is spam. The stats above reflect the process
by which e-mail is either rejected or accepted with totals at the top.


Greylisting is a new theory in spam reduction. Essentially, a connection
is rejected with a temporary rejection code which allows servers that
follow standards to try again later, while many spam sources do not
bother to try again. We recently implemented a form of greylisting where
when we receive a message the SpamAssassin scores over a limit, we block
further contact with that source for a short time. The theory is that it
should reduce the total attempted spam e-mail connections thus reducing
load on the server. Time will tell.







Reply via email to