Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday, November 26, 2006, 1:55:48 AM, Andrzej Filip wrote: >> + I spent 2-3s on average to confirm *myself* spamasssassin's verdict >> of "classified as spam" and move message to spam-report folder >> (mostly from spambox folder) >> + *All* remaining actions [classification and reporting] are *fully* >> automated, all I do personally is "*short* inspection, drag & drop >> to another folder" > > Automation after confirmation should be fine. It's the > human confirmation of the classification that's important, so we > can be reasonably sure they're really spams.
0) The described procedure is fully sufficient for automatic confirmation of reports about SMTP spam sources and relays. 1) It leaves "reasonable doubts" if it is good for automatic confirmation of spamvertized URLs (by non spamassassin scripts) as suggested by spamcop.net "report page" *after* via SMTP submission by "spamassassin -r" without further *human* inspection. It is common for 419 spam to include links to innocent web site with "crash story" (typically cnn.com and bbc.co.uk). 2) I am ready to modify my spamcop-ack.pl script to exclude "www" and "i-www" reports from *automatic* confirmation. Is somebody interested? P.S. Every spam received constitutes perfect solicitation for abuse report. Help good nets stay clean, take away "if we only knew" excuse. -- [pl2en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
