Sorry, last email was a poor example. Try this one.
Before sa-learn:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.201 required=4.9 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001,
HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=4.2]
After sa-learn:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=4.8 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=ham
version=3.1.0
The difference in required score is conf differences between SA and
Amavis-new.
Pat...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Patrick Sherrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: sa-learn treating spam as ham
Patrick Sherrill wrote:
'sa-learn --spam addspam' seems to add the sender to AWL and mark the
message as ham. Any clues on what I may be doing incorrectly? (SA 3.1.0)
sa-learn doesn't add the message to the AWL... however *EVERY* message
you receive is added to it.
That said, being in the AWL doesn't mean it's whitelisted.... The AWL
isn't a whitelist, but has some whitelist and blacklist behaviors. It's
really a history-tracking score averager.
Can you post and X-Spam-Status the message got when it was received, and
one after it was sa-learned?
Pat...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CocoNet Corporation
SW Florida's First ISP
