From: Steve [Spamassasin] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date:Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:16 GMT-07:00
Should be -0700 not GMT-07:00. This may also trigger the DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, since probably the SA's date parsing module simply discards the zone offset data. giampaolo > To:... > Return-Path:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-Original-To:... > Delivered-To:... > Received:from mx9.smf.ebay.com (mxsmfpool05.ebay.com > [66.135.209.202]) by ... (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C81D8C24 for > <...>; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:04:00 +0000 (GMT) > Received:from sjc2bat08.sjc.ebay.com (sjc2bat08.sjc.ebay.com > [10.11.37.18]) by mx9.smf.ebay.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id > kAMG3oaM009188 for <...>; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:03:58 -0700 > X-eBay-MailTracker:10089.487.3.0 > MIME-Version:1.0 > Content-Type:multipart/alternative; > boundary=7101714.1164211396002.JavaMail.ebba.sjc2bat08 > Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > > While I understand why this email may have triggered the Bayesian > rule (where spammers have copied ebay's email style...) I am > bemused by INVALID_DATE and DATE_IN_PAST_06_12. > > The dates I see in the header look valid to me - and (if we allow > for time international time differences) the message was sent two > seconds before it was received. > > Am I overlooking something here? Why doesn't SpamAssassin like > these dates? > > Steve > >
