Hi, since it says webmail, I would not be surprised to see a webmail application that does qp encoding all the time. libertzsurf.net is a french operation, and iso-latin-1 os preferred encoding for french
Wolfgang Hamann >> >> I got the following spam. I've included the header: >> >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Received: from mail.libertysurf.net (webmail-out.libertysurf.net >> [213.36.80.105]) >> by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id >> kAM1ckKs008704 >> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:38:52 -0700 >> Received: from aliceadsl.fr (192.168.10.57) by mail.libertysurf.net (7.1.026) >> id 43F3DDC5003935BF; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:22:49 +0100 >> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:22:49 +0100 >> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Representative_Needed.?= >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> X-Sensitivity: 3 >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary="_=__=_XaM3_.1164158569.2A.498089.42.6019.52.42.007.3770" >> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> My question is this. The encoding of the Subject: and From: lines >> is redundant. There are no non-USASCII characters in either field. >> Hence, specifying =?iso-8859-1?Q? is not necessary. >> >> The test SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP seems to handle this (at least the Subject: >> part). I'd like to crank it up to 3.5 or higher. >> >> Any intuitive reasons why this wouldn't work? Are there any >> valid mailers that are braindead? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Philip >> >> >>
