On Tue, November 14, 2006 03:56, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Nov 13 14:59:29 mail mimedefang[5737]: kADLxLLR021067: Bouncing because filter > instructed us to
i hope it will reject not bounce > Nov 13 14:59:29 mail sendmail[21067]: kADLxLLR021067: Milter: data, reject=554 > 5.7.1 Message rejected; scored too high on the Spam test. > Nov 13 14:59:29 mail sendmail[21067]: kADLxLLR021067: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:03, pri=31207, > stat=Message rejected; scored too high on the Spam test. > > I've put into my spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf file: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp.microsoft.com Resolved 131.107.115.212 to smtp.microsoft.com. to mail1.microsoft.com. to maila.microsoft.com. maila.microsoft.com. has no MX records -> [microsoft.com has 3 MX records mailc.microsoft.com.(10) maila.microsoft.com.(10) mailb.microsoft.com.(10)] > What am I missing at this point? > > Does the 2nd arg to the whitelist_from_rcvd need to be > maila.microsoft.com instead? > > And what do DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE and DNS_FROM_RFC_POST correspond to? > Where do I get the descriptions of these tests, why some sites get > tagged with them, etc? http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-abuse.php in spamassassin 3.2.x thease test will not be there and we all will have less problems with spam :( -- This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
