They mostly only hit bayes (running 3.1.7).
ImageInfo.pm is very helpful here

0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
        [score: 1.0000]
0.8 SARE_GIF_ATTACH FULL: Email has a inline gif
3.0 DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO Message contains a single large inline gif

Most also hit John Rudd's jr_rfc1912.cf too.
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/


Patrick Sneyers

Op 8-nov-06, om 13:02 heeft Hall J D ((ISeLS)) het volgende geschreven:

Hi,

I've just run sa-update on my 3.1.4 box and it's not picked up anything
new. In fact it looking at the dates on the files it looks like there
haven't been any updates to these rules since the first time I ran
sa-update back in August.

Is sa-update only supporting the newer releases of 3.1.x?

Thanks,

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 November 2006 17:44
To: Loren Wilton
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Block "wrote:" spams


there's a rule that matches them in 3.1.x sa-update, fwiw.

--j.

Loren Wilton writes:
I haven't seen any of these.  But if the spams universally have
"<single word> wrote: <stuff>" as the subject then I'd consider a more
stringent rule:

    /^\w+\s+wrote:/i

or
    /^(?:\w+\s+){1,2}wrote:/i

or
    /^(?:re:\s*|fw:\s*){0,20}(?:\w+\s+){1,2}wrote:/i

        Loren

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Juan Mas
  To: MIKE YRABEDRA
  Cc: spamassassin-users
  Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 7:15 AM
  Subject: Re: Block "wrote:" spams


  Ive been getting the same and just wrote a rule for it today.  Ive
got what you have listed below.  Havent tested it though.


  On 11/3/06, MIKE YRABEDRA < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


    I am getting a lot of these "Bob wrote: " spams

Anyone know a way to write the rule so if the subject has "wrote:"
in the
    subject, tag it?

    Here is what I have?

    header WROTE_SUB      Subject =~ /\bwrote\:\b/i
    describe WROTE_SUB      Wrote in Subject
    score WROTE_SUB       3.0




    --
    Mike Yrabedra B^)>







  --
  -Juan

Reply via email to