> Hi, > > My spam scores look like these: > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 tag1=-999.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0 > tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, > HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, > RCVD_IN_XBL > X-Spam-Level: ****** > > > How could I present the exact score of every filter, like you do? > I.e. filter=score. > What configuration options I have to make to my local.cf or amavisd.conf?
None. I'm using amavisd-new. An e-mail gets tagged that way when its score reaches sa_tag_level_deflt. Hoever, I'm not the one that reported that output: it was actually a reply to a message from Leon, who was the reporter. Giampaolo > > > Best Regards, > Leon Kolchinsky > > -----Original Message----- > From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 2:03 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: R: Further on DNS_FROM_RFC_* > > > I just received some email from Spamcop, and thought to check the > > spamassassin scores on it: > > > > No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, > > DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME=0.001,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, > > FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=1.593,SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no version=3.1.7 > > > > I was quite amused to see the DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE score there, on a > > message from spamcop. I would suggest that if a major spam player like > > spamcop doesn't accept abuse@ emails, then it's further indication that > > perhaps the test isn't terribly useful as a determination of whether the > > email is/isn't spam. > > Maybe this is why it scores just 0.2? > > Giampaolo > > > > > Kurt >
