Using sql based AWL, this target:
 select * from awl where email like "%peppers%";
+----------+-----------------------------------+--------+-------+-------
---+
| username | email                             | ip     | count |
totscore |
+----------+-----------------------------------+--------+-------+-------
---+
| amavis   | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 216.17 |   129 |
475.064 |

I would assume the AWL score would be 3.68.

I get AWL score of: -0.961:

(yes, its amavisd-new)  Any idea why? And if this is the right score?

X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AWL=-0.961,
        BAYES_95=3, BR_SPAMMER_URI=2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SARE_UNI=0.591,
        SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from peppersandrogersgroup.com (peppersandrogersgroup.com
[216.17.48.37])
        by 0.mail.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADECD5FF435
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:14:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PRG3 ([192.168.30.37]) by peppersandrogersgroup.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
         Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:22:07 -0500
From: 1to1 Media<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How Smart Marketers Spend Their Money
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:22:07 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-UNIQUEID: 245204
X-BPS1: 1753
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary.11111111.11111111"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2006 13:22:07.0328 (UTC)
FILETIME=[933DF600:01C6F381]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--Boundary.11111111.11111111
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

--Boundary.11111111.11111111
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


--Boundary.11111111.11111111--

-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
561-999-5000, ext 1131
SECNAP Network Security Corporation
Keep up to date with latest information on IT security: Real time
security alerts: http://www.secnap.com/news
 

Reply via email to