On Fri, October 20, 2006 20:22, Michael Beckmann wrote: > I have been tempted to increase the BAYES_99 score to 5. I have seen that > only very few ham messages of the newsletter type ever score BAYES_99 in my > inbox.
doit > Do others make similar observations? How do you deal with this? i have changed bayes scores to catch most spam here, and changed threshold to learn spam / ham with less range so it more accurate and prevents bayes poinson on the same time, just have them at scores so spam is still autolearned, and ham is still autolearned, check that you don't have whitelist with -100 for spam mails :) if you use whitelist from or whitelist at all make sure it will not trigger the bayes ham learnning on its own if your bayes have nearly same count of spam / ham msgs its good manualy learn helps aswell -- "This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
