Title: RE: This image is turning frequent..

I'm embarrassed to ask but, what cf file is that from?

--Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:45 PM
> To: Chris Santerre
> Cc: Kelson; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: This image is turning frequent..
>
>
> Just FYI increasing SARE_GIX_STOX has removed this spam from
> my mailbox.
>   It's doing something right.  (I was getting 1-2 an hour prior to
> increasing that rule's score)
>
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> > Exactly... and that SARE ruleset is coming very soon :)
> >
> > --Chris
> >
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >  > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:28 PM
> >  > To: Kelson
> >  > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >  > Subject: Re: This image is turning frequent..
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > I think you guys are going down a much harder road. 
> This only makes
> >  > sense if and when e-mail with only a GIF is a normal type of
> >  > e-mail that
> >  > people find acceptable.  Otherwise, just score e-mail
> with only a GIF
> >  > and/or some extra bayes poison high and don't bother
> analyzing it.
> >  >
> >  > Kelson wrote:
> >  > > decoder wrote:
> >  > >> But that is a difficult task considering how many things
> >  > are possible
> >  > >> with the GIF standard. This picture uses offsets and slow
> >  > frame rates,
> >  > >> others use transparency etc. A simple way to block these
> >  > images would
> >  > >> be to scan the GIF for offset frames. I don't think there
> >  > is any valid
> >  > >> GIF which makes use of these techniques...
> >  > >
> >  > > If "offset frames" means what I think it does, they're
> >  > actually a fairly
> >  > > common technique in animated GIFs where you only need to
> >  > change part of
> >  > > the image.  After all, if you're changing a 30x50 section
> >  > of a 200x200
> >  > > image, why waste space on an extra 38,500 pixels?
> >  > >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Jo Rhett
> >  > Network/Software Engineer
> >  > Net Consonance
> >  >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
> Network/Software Engineer
> Net Consonance
>

Reply via email to