From: "Scott Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has anyone figured a good recipe for blocking these type of spam yet?
I get 3-5 per day to each user on my mail server.
Thanks
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Work has been closed permanently
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 21:28:50 +0600
From: Leslie Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Attention ,
Find out how to generate 1.5 - 3.5k per day from your home.
800.671.9007
Phone me at my number if you can return calls.
Thanks Alot,
Leslie Hilton
The lowest scoring one of those puppies to hit here ran up a score
of 7.3:
-1.5 JD_SENDER_RELAY Good list with Sender header
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails
3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 95 to 99%
[score: 0.9771]
0.0 JD_VHI_BAYES JD_VHI_BAYES
0.0 JD_HI_BAYES JD_HI_BAYES
3.8 JD_HI_BAYES_LKML LKML likely spam
2.0 JD_VHI_BAYES_LKML LKML very likely spam
That first rule that was hit shows it was through an open mailing list.
The BAYES_95 rule hits 3.0 points here. I don't remember changing it
from the default. It triggered two rules for BAYES being pretty strong
spam indicators. The VHI BAYES is 95 or 99. The HI BAYES is 80, 95, or
99. They are components for the next two rules that hit which are meta
rules indicating high and very high BAYES scores and an open mailing
list relay.
Poof - spam gone. It works very nicely here for three lists I am on
that work with open relaying and don't have "perfect" spam filtering.
{^_-}
