From: "Dhaval Patel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dhaval Patel wrote:
> I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place.
>
> I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for this
> message troubling. I use spamc in the maildrop rule but I put that message
> through spamassassin -t -D and get the same score so I am assuming that it is
>running the exact same way. I have pasted the output below.
>
> I checked the sender IP and it seems that they are blacklisted on sbl-xbl as well as
> a few other lists. But spamassassin did not pick this up. Can anybody give any
> insight into this? I do see other spams being caught because of RBLs.
> What is "-3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts" How
> is it determined that the host (71.214.161.98) was trusted.
You need to configure your trusted_networks. See this wiki article:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/TrustPath
OK, adding trusted_networks myIP to local.cf works. Now I get
3.5 HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (IP addr 2)
which makes the spam score 8.9 which is considered as spam.
I have read that article before but assumed that it was only if your mail
server was
behind a NAT, which mine is not. Do other people on this list find that they
must set
this option in order for SA to avoid problems like I experienced?
If email comes to your machine via an MX record then you probably need
to trust your machine by its address on the Internet not (just) by
127.0.0.1.
{^_^}
