Re: Drink it, forget it ! .... bug in _check_date_diff

[Daryl C. W. O'Shea]

I haven't read any of the rest of this thread, but I'll respond to the 
latest...

Robert Nicholson wrote:
Well either way. Assuming that the lowest numbered date diff represents 
the real receive time is niave at best.

As is assuming that the rule assumes that the times are real.

Comparing the Date: header and the time in a received header that you 
can trust would FP all over the place any time there was a delay (down 
MX, etc.) in legit mail.


Daryl