> -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:20 PM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: BUG? sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -r different results > > Second, You mis-understood my question. I know you erased > your bayes DB. > > I was asking if the message had already been scanned, and > thus marked, by SA. I'm asking a question about the > text-content of the message, not about the contents of your bayes DB.
No, it was not scanned by sa, there was no text markup in it, and tried with and without -d option to spamassassin. Further, spamassassin sent LESS tokens to db than sa-learn (which has no -d option ) Clearly, both are using different routines to score and classify tokens.
