On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > The only /non-technical/ issue that occurs to me is in the > licensing, which is a combination of the Apache License (2.0) and > a custom clause that may be a non-starter for some applications: > "If you wish to use it for commercial gain you must contact The > MITRE Corporation for conditions of use." This might preclude its > (free) use in SpamAssassin-based appliances, or at for-profit ISPs > and offsite mail-filtering services.
If licensing is in any way an issue, then FuzzyOCR should be structured such that it's very easy to choose which OCR engine you wish it to use. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The problem is when people look at Yahoo, slashdot, or groklaw and jump from obvious and correct observations like "Oh my God, this place is teeming with utter morons" to incorrect conclusions like "there's nothing of value here". -- Al Petrofsky, in Y! SCOX ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 days until The 219th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution
