> -----Original Message----- > From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report > > Starting out with another clean database, further testing > shows that in fact the message was learned when I ran > 'spamassassin -r' (though bayes_toks remained at 12288 > bytes), and the same message was learned again when I ran > 'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes). > > 0.000 0 1 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 177 0 non-token data: ntokens > > 0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: nspam > 0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham > 0.000 0 500 0 non-token data: ntokens
Q: did you run sa-learn --sync after each one? MAYBE spamassassin doesn't --sync, but write it to a journal. > > Gary V > > _________________________________________________________________ > Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search: Try it now! > http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=weather&FORM=WLMTAG > > >
