On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 10:25 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 03:06:54PM +0100, John Horne wrote: > > scantime=5.2,size=3097,mid=<dfee66ed26bce3c839092a95248645c8@>,bayes=1, > > > > I have searched through the MTA logs for the past month, and used a > > shortened part of the above mid, but nothing was found. So the question > > is how come SA shows a 'mid=dfee66ed26bce3c839092a95248645c8@' value but > > the MTA log files show nothing? > > > > Anyone have any ideas about this? > > MTA is broken? > Nah :-)
> MTA generates the Message-ID (so it logs nothing coming in, > but then SA sees one)? > Nope, the MTA doesn't generate a Message-ID header. > Message actually has no Message-ID but has a > Resent-Message-ID? > > Without seeing the message it's hard to say. > Unfortunately I don't have all the headers for the message. I'll see if I can get the MTA to log when a message arrives with no Message-ID but does have a Resent-Message-ID. I can then compare what is logged by the MTA with the SA log. Not sure if the MTA would, by default, log the Resent-Message-ID if no Message-ID was present. I'll see if I can find out, and perhaps suggest it if it doesn't. Thanks for the replies, John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839
