Somebody who write the rule had a sense of humor, I suspect.
The actual rule searches for completely, totally, or all followed by
natural anywhere in the body of the message.
In the past this has been a pretty good indication that the message
is indeed spam.
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Brink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hey Bill,
Sorry about that- first timer in this group... anyone know why a message
is scored with the following?:
"2.6 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!"
Thanks again,
Nate
________________________________
From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why would you hijack someone else's thread? If you are not going to at
least response to the original question, then at least have the courtesy
to start your own new message thread.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathan Brink <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello SA Users,
Our software uses SpamAssassin to score various content, but the
score below doesn't make much sense:
"2.6 ALL_NATURAL BODY: Spam is 100% natural?!"
Anyone familiar with this or have insight? Also, if there is
any documentation on scoring, please send that along too.
Thanks!
Nate
________________________________
From: Hardy, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:21 AM
To: users
Subject: Spamassassin munging headers
A few particular email servers have been complaining about
munged email headers and it seems that SpamAssassin is the culprit. I
saw something about this somewhere on another list, but couldn't find a
fix. It seems as if the problem still exists in the latest version.
The "workaround" was to remove status headers:
remove_header all Status
I believe the problem was in a lack of a proper return at the
end of the spamassassin version line? Only a /n or a /r and not both. Is
anyone else aware of this problem?
Anthony Hardy
Director of Technology/IS
Jefferson Davis Community College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
251.809.1531
