On 23-Aug-06, at 1:01 PM, Michael Grey wrote:
Sorry, I was too philosophical in my question... to rephrase;
In the standard SA config, should I expect to see an SPF_* rule hit
returned
when the SPF return value is 'none' ?
This is from the latest 50_scores.cf
# SPF
# Note that the benefit for a valid SPF record is deliberately
minimal; it's
# likely that more spammers would quickly move to setting valid SPF
records
# otherwise. The penalties for an *incorrect* record, however, are
large. ;)
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
score SPF_PASS -0.001
score SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001
# <gen:mutable>
score SPF_FAIL 0 1.333 0 1.142
score SPF_HELO_FAIL 0
score SPF_HELO_NEUTRAL 0
score SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL 0 2.078 0 2.432
score SPF_NEUTRAL 0 1.379 0 1.069
score SPF_SOFTFAIL 0 1.470 0 1.384
# </gen:mutable>
endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF
So the answer to your question is no you shouldn't. Their is no score
to cover NONE.
--
Gino Cerullo
Pixel Point Studios
21 Chesham Drive
Toronto, ON M3M 1W6
416-247-7740
