Nigel Frankcom wrote:
I will turn on auto leaarn mostly because I need to feed more HAM to SA
(so far I only feed ham for any false positive which is very low daily
and i think that is not good enough for SA)
If it is well trained then Bayes should be hitting. It may be that
SA cannot get to the Bayes database due to privileges.
(I manually train here. I distrust automatic training.)
{^_^}
I agree with not autotraining, imo it's a damned good way to get your
bayes poisoned. With beast's error I got the impression only _some_
mails were being missed which would imply either a file lock issue or
not enough child processes?
I also agree with your point, however I need to feed more HAM (not spam)
message, which is not easy to obtain, unless we dump all users mail to
one mailbox.
For bayes file locking problem, I'm not quite sure because not complaint
in log:
Aug 13 22:11:01 blowfish spampd[9828]: clean message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (1.67/5.20) from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in 0.33s, 2587 bytes.
Yesterday, i was received 5 FN mails which are not have scanned by
bayes (low score), this for postmaster only, i'm not sure if its
applicable to other address also.
--beast
