When using amavisd-new a ramdisk. Ralf Hildebrandt has setup a small page about it:
http://www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb/postfix/amavisd_tmpfs.shtml He says it gives some optimalization. Regards, Xander From: "Bjorn Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ? > The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd > doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed > things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the > question, does spamassassin do any disk intensive things ? > I'm running that gocr image scanning as well, could this benefit from > it, or is it the network lookups that are the slow part in any case ? > Currently a mail is processed in about 1.5 - 6 seconds Ramdisk is no different than keeping it daemonized in ram except that you'd still have to go through the spamassassin perl load. That is why spamc/spamd exist. > > -- > > A: Because it messes up the order Observation. Side posting has > in which people normally read text. the best chance of preserving > Q: Why is it such a bad thing? context, doesn't it? > A: Top-posting {^,-}
