On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:14:06PM -0500, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> All those scores in the cf are just "WAGs", since none have been
> masschecked.   Theo, could you sandbox this?

I made some major edits (1/3 smaller and also faster :) ), but the core
algorithm is the same.  Overall, very good from my results:

  MSECS    SPAM%     HAM%     S/O    RANK   SCORE  NAME
      0    29412     4952    0.856   0.00    0.00  (all messages)
0.00000  85.5896  14.4104    0.856   0.00    0.00  (all messages as %)
  7.162   8.3673   0.0000    1.000   0.93    3.00  DC_GIF_UNO_LARGO
  3.681   4.3010   0.0000    1.000   0.79    3.00  DC_IMAGE_SPAM
  0.576   0.6732   0.0000    1.000   0.24    3.00  DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.17    4.00  DC_PNG_MULTI_LARGO
  0.000   0.0000   0.0000    0.500   0.17    4.00  DC_GIF_MULTI_LARGO

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Today I set a motherboard on fire. Now the bizarre thing is that after 
 the smoke cleared it still worked." - Alan Cox

Attachment: pgphpycSfnHFA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to