John D. Hardin wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
> Reducing volume of spam *sent* probably requires fundamental redesign
> of the protocols, or some other major change in the cost/benefit
> analysis.
> 
Don't think that's needed, if ISP's only allow outgoing SMTP to the ISP's
SMTP servers and not directly then most (current) bots and most spam will be
dealt with. I wouldn't be surprised to see the amount of spam then drop more
than 80%. (I know, just repeating myself ;-))
Come to think of it, changes are the zombies/bots will then be used for
DDOS'ing everything that has an IP-address just as revenge :(

Regards
Menno
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/What-changes-would-you-make-to-stop-spam----United-Nations-Paper-tf2035870.html#a5618619
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to