LOL! Thanks for the reminder. Best of luck in your efforts to "stop SPAM"
around the world.
Sincerest regards,
James Butler
Chairman, Board of Directors
Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
California, USA
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 8/1/06 at 11:29 PM jdow wrote:
>Mr Butler, with all due respect go pound sand. You've convinced me that
>we should kick the UN out of the United States so that idiots like you
>do not spam mailing lists like this.
>
>You're an fscking idiot.
>{`,'}
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 21:05
>Subject: Re: What changes would you make to stop spam? - United Nations
>Paper
>
>
>>A little bit sorry for the top-post ... but .. Re: Kofi Annan's quote
>> from the post dated today at around 6:20 PM PST:
>>
>> "The problem has risen to a level requiring that the United Nations be
>> aware of the issue and to take steps to address the problem.*"*
>>
>> I simply do not agree. The U.N. has far more important and pressing
>> issues to deal with than SPAM, which is essentially a corporate
>> productivity problem.
>>
>> Consider: Oh, geez, the hundreds of truly consequential issues facing a
>> global assembly of governments in today's world.
>>
>> Compare that with (from my own example) the several hundreds of SPAM
>> message I filter for my staff, each day. Ok ... after a weekend off,
>> it's somewhere areound 1,500 SPAM message ... regardless, with a tiny
>> bit of traning, any human can be trained to quickly scan the company
>> queue and remove any of today's SPAM from the company inboxes.
>>
>> While I agree that even that is too much for a small business to be
>> satisfied with (it certainly won't make the company go broke), it's
>> simply not that great an issue, when compared to world-affecting issues
>> like Poverty and whatnot.
>>
>> I say "good luck" with your proposal but NOT "good luck" getting the
>> money you want to get from the U.N. to be put toward "solving" this
>> problem. It's simply not an issue I believe we should be spending any
>> portion of that particular budget for.
>>
>> Sincerest regards,
>>
>> James Butler
>> Chairman, Board of Directors
>> Internet Society - Los Angeles Chapter
>> California, USA
>>
>> John Rudd wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2006, at 6:54 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> From: "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Allowing IMAP/POP to Send Email
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...is there an echo in here? ;)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Having also said the same thing ... Doesn't part of Microsoft's
>>> extension to IMAP (called MAPI, oh so original) also support sending
>>> via IMAP?
>>
