On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote: > >> 4a) maybe generalize #4 to include various other RFC issues (matching > >> PTR and A records is an RFC requirement, after all), such as the > >> things tracked at RFC-Ignorant > > > > Less feasible, too many players. > > I don't see how it's too many players. It's just expanding an already > existent RBL to add more criteria of the same flavor.
Ah, okay, I misunderstood. I didn't think 4a was about a RBL. Comment withdrawn. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [Small arms] are fundamentally dangerous and their removal from the equation either by control, neutralisation or removal is essential. The first step is to gain information on their numbers and whereabouts. -- the UN, who "doesn't want to confiscate guns" -----------------------------------------------------------------------
