On Jul 30, 2006, at 4:37 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:23 PM, jdow wrote:
I am a bit of a heretic in this group because I take the nasty step
of taking rules that are almost always right (one error per thousand
or more hits) and make sure the score on the rule is designed to
push the score AWAY from 5.0 in the appropriate direction.
Do you have your score variations published anywhere?
Might be a useful "alternate score set" or something.
Not the scoring variations. There is WAY too much "ymmv" involved.
Yeah, I kind of like the idea of a more distinct separation between
spam and ham though, and wouldn't mind seeing how the results differ.
Wouldn't mind seeing a published "alternate" version of the scores
which embodies the "brassiere" curve, so to speak.
And, just think, somehow, such a publication might make "Joanne's
Brassiere Curve" a technical term :-) (sorry, in a silly mood today)
