-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:19 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: traveling user unable to email
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> I'm really getting frustrated here
>
> I whitelisted all her email addresses and aliases
>
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] fcimail.org
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] familycareintl.org
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] fcimail.org
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] familycareintl.org
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 68.167.21.154
>
> and she just got rejected again
>
> is this not the correct way to whitlist
>
> this is the local.cf in
> /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin
>
> And I did run --lint as wel as restart spamd
If you could give us the full headers of a message we would be more likely to
be able to tell you
why this isn't working.
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected after DATA: This message scored 8.8
points. Congratulations!
Envelope-from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P Received: from [196.201.130.183]
(helo=anglo-t22yp.familycareintl.org)
by mail.familycareintl.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD))
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1G5T2J-000Eja-2T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:57:50 -0400 I
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:56:14 -0400
T To: "Jean-Paul Natola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> F From: Ellen Brazier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: also change now Eudora
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=====================_17373221==.ALT"
X-Spam-Score: 8.8 (++++++++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "milter.fci",
has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
The administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Okay, I've put that in. Should "allow
Authentification"
be checked or unchecked? At 7/25/2006 03:52 PM, you wrote: >Try
www.fcimail.org > > > >
Content analysis details: (8.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
[196.201.130.183 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.1 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[196.201.130.183 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
1.9 FORGED_MUA_EUDORA Forged mail pretending to be from Eudora
1.7 INVALID_MSGID Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC
2822
X-Spam-Flag: YES
