Words by Theo Van Dinter [Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:49:35PM -0400]: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:37:10AM +0100, Jose Celestino wrote: > > Does anyone know why 'stop-at-threshold' option disappeared with > > Spamassassin 3.0 ? Is there any performance improving option with the > > same effect? > > Yes and no. > > > ... > > > Ok, so first, stop-at-threshold was removed *AGES* ago, 2.50 specifically (Feb > 2003). So it didn't really disappear in 3.0 -- in fact 3.0 still accepts it > and throws a warning. So, the short short version about why it went away (you > can search the archives/bugzilla if you want) is that it didn't work right, > and potentially made things slower. >
Searched for it, even on the SpamAssassin cvs, but there was too much noise. Well... > Second ... There isn't currently any short-circuit ability in SA. However, > it's being discussed and there's some initial implementation going on in 3.2. > Great. Looking forward for that. Thanks for the quick answer. -- Jose Celestino | http://xpto.org/~japc/files/japc-pgpkey.asc ---------------------------------------------------------------- "I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they’d never expect it.” — Jack Handy
