On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote: > did you investigate auto-learning? This might let your system learn ham > as well as spam. Works fine here (same situation - gateway server to a > Lotus Notes system, no feedback loop possible)
May be I should change the threshholds for autolearning different from the default? (I never touched them so far). I just found *lots* 'autolearn=ham' in my log, and I can not believe that so many are correct. Out of the current log I see Mail classified as 21805 ham 11493 autolearned as ham (this seems suspiciously high?) 85963 spam 52977 autolearned as spam So I fear the 'skew' in my database comes form autoloearning 'bayes-fodder' of spammers and not fron 'skewed explicite learning'. WHat may make it even worse is, that 'inhouse mail==ham' is never learned, because it's never spamchecked (users did complain too much about the slowdown, so only the 'outside' goes through the Spamfilter). Stucki -- Christoph von Stuckrad * * |nickname |<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ Freie Universitaet Berlin |/_*|'stucki' |Tel(days):+49 30 838-5 57 78| Mathematik & Informatik EDV |\ *|if online|Tel(else):+49 30 77 39 66 00| Arnimallee 6 / 14195 Berlin * * |on IRCnet|Fax(alle):+49 30 838-75 454/
