On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Dirk Bonengel wrote: ... > If I was in your position, I'd try to switch over to a system like Maia > Mailguard that keeps a copy of each mail in a database and users can > confirm and/or correct the underlying SpamAssassin engine's decisions. > This system uses a singel bayes DB....Works fine at a customer of ours > that uses some weird proprietary document managing software
THIS looks *very* interesting, as it may directly solve the problems we planned to solve in our *next* MTA (not postfix, but exim4 + cyrus) where we already 'test' amavisd-new+clamav+nai-uvscan for filtering and where we needed acces for the users to the filter-settings. Does it really keep *every* Mail in the database? Or only Mail which might be accepted if the user wants it. (>50% Mail coming in have useless adresses here) But *now* I'm stuck with qmail+qmail-queue-patch and the older amavis-perl(largely patched). So *now* the users have no influence except 'telling me' [which they mostly do not] :-) Stucki
