On Montag, 19. Juni 2006 05:42 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Meanwhile, I do think that filtering outgoing mail from such places
> as open internet nodes at hotels and other places like that is
> probably a good thing.  But simply tagging by itself does not seem
> useful to me.

It's a legal thing: You are not allowed to throw away e-mail from your 
customers, they could sue you. Yes, false positives, right...

There exist many tools that filter on SpamAssassin headers (Mozilla 
Thunderbird), so it can be valuable for the receiver's filter to have 
that scan results. Even for a company: If one PC got some infection and 
sends SPAM, at least you marked all messages as such.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531                          .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:        "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2  9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                 Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE

Attachment: pgpM1b0zhISJW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to