On Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:52 PM -0700 kbaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is visionary in that it is not the "norm", but again DBMail does all of
this very well and has been production quality for quite some time.
I asked on the Dovecot list about how Dovecot compares to DBMail and got
this reply from Dovecot's author:
------------ Forwarded Message ------------
Date: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:43 AM +0300
From: Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] DBMail versus Dovecot (was: Using MySQL to store
email?)
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 18:12 -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Saturday, June 10, 2006 10:07 AM -0400 Charles Marcus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A reference to DBMail was among the first responses, and there have been
> others.
Has anyone compiled a comparison of Dovecot to DBMail? Why would I chose
one over the other?
I think their goals are quite different. Don't know if any such
comparisons would be all that useful.
Or I guess I can give you one difference: Dovecot tries very hard to be
secure. DBMail then seems to keep adding SQL injection security holes. I
said about this to them a few years ago and they fixed them, but now
that I looked at the code a few months ago they had added more of those.
---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
