On 6/10/2006 8:07 PM, David Goldsmith wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A message with this set of SA headers just made it through to my mailbox.

  X-Spam-Flag: YES
  X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on
        iceman12.giac.net
  X-Spam-Level: ******
  X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 required=6.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,
        BAYES_00,DRUGS_DIET,ISC_FORUM,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,
        SPF_HELO_PASS,SUB_HELLO autolearn=no version=3.1.3

The message score was 7.0 but the X-Spam-Level header only had 6 stars.
We filter using procmail using the following two rules:

  # Catch messages scoring 7.0 or higher
  :0:
  * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*
  /home/nullmail/nullmail-spam

  # Catch messages scoring 6.8-6.9
  :0:
  * ^X-Spam-Level: \*\*\*\*\*\*
  * ^X-Spam-Status:.*score=6\.[89]
  /home/nullmail/nullmail-spam

Has anyone seen this behavior before? Was this some sort of glitch?

Yes.  No.  See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RoundingIssues

Add   * ^X-Spam-Status:.*score=7\.0   to your procmail recipe.


Daryl
  • Labeling Bug? David Goldsmith
    • Re: Labeling Bug? Daryl C. W. O'Shea

Reply via email to