DAve wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > With SA 3.1.2 just released, 3.0.4 is archaic. It's like fighting > > the Gulf War with WWII weapons. (And anyone using SA 2.xx is using > > stuff from the 19th century.) > > I would, without a moments hesitation, trade a M-16 for a M1 Garrand > or an M-14. Keep the M-9 as well, give me a 1911-A1 over that double > nine, please. 19th century? How about you take a M-16, I take a > Whitworth, we start at 1000 yds and see who wins? ;^) > > Don't discount 2.6x. Well tuned by a knowledgeable sysadmin, who > knows his mail content, with custom rulesets, could have a better > capture rate than an out of the box install of SA-3.n.e.w by a > shrinkwrap admin.
Sure, a good general could do well in a war with old equipment. But just think what he could do with 21st century technology! In the same way, 2.6x can be tuned to work pretty well, but if that same knowledgeable sysadmin tunes 3.1x, he will get even better results. As was mentioned before, anti-spam is like anti-virus. The attacks are constantly changing, so the defenses must also be constantly updated if you want to stay ahead. -- Bowie
