Benjamin Adams wrote:
On my client:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.984 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=DIET_1,
> HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, UPPERCASE_25_50
...
On The server:
...
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.9 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
[222.52.10.129 listed in combined.njabl.org]
1.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: aboummile.com]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: aboummile.com]
As a guess, I'd say that your client (do you mean your actual mail
client, or do you mean something that adds this header as the message
arrives?) isn't running Bayes or network tests, but your server is.
If you're running SA through amavisd-new, check the config there and
make sure it's not set to run only local tests. That should bring in
3.5 points from RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL and URIBL_SBL.
Also, see if Amavisd-new has problems with rules added from sa-update.
I'm not familiar with Amavisd, but MIMEDefang had to add support for
those rules. IIRC, URIBL_BLACK isn't in the base distribution yet, but
is in the sa-update set.
