Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Craig McLean wrote on Sat, 13 May 2006 14:18:31 +0100:
http://spamlegalaction.pbwiki.com/
Rules in CA might be a little different, but the principle is likely to
be the same..
Just that you don't get hold of the "nasty" spammers. And the "nice"
spammers are easily blocked.
I disagree. I have no way to block any kind of spammers without risking
false positives (I am exagerating here. I have very few negatives, and
since about 6 months, no false positives at all. spammers hearing the
list can decide to "punish" me, but I am ready for that war...). Anyway,
I find it easier to block "nasty" spam than "honest" spam.
