Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:57:05PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
For more information, here's the results of last week's net mass-check run
(net results should be "live"):
Oh, I meant to add in Razor results since someone mentioned them as well:
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 181939 52229 0.777 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
0.00000 77.6959 22.3041 0.777 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
22.377 28.8009 0.0000 1.000 1.00 0.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL
26.604 34.2378 0.0134 1.000 1.00 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL
28.358 36.4925 0.0211 0.999 1.00 0.00 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100
24.854 31.9854 0.0115 1.000 1.00 0.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL
12.423 15.9889 0.0000 1.000 0.98 0.00 URIBL_AB_SURBL
23.278 29.9463 0.0479 0.998 0.96 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL
15.377 19.7803 0.0383 0.998 0.95 0.00 URIBL_SBL
42.188 54.2671 0.1091 0.998 0.94 0.00 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100
26.620 34.2367 0.0881 0.997 0.94 0.00 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100
43.678 56.1512 0.2298 0.996 0.87 0.00 RAZOR2_CHECK
29.707 38.1606 0.2585 0.993 0.85 0.00 URIBL_BLACK
0.236 0.3028 0.0038 0.988 0.67 0.00 URIBL_PH_SURBL
0.020 0.0264 0.0000 1.000 0.50 0.00 URIBL_RED
0.515 0.4353 0.7946 0.354 0.45 0.00 URIBL_GREY
Interesting, my Razor stats show a MUCH higher false positive rate, so
much so that I had to lower the scores dramatically.
Spam Ham
1 RAZOR2_CHECK 9744 6.79 33.40 82.84 8.18
2 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 9303 6.48 31.89 79.09 7.37
6 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 5597 3.90 19.18 47.59 0.52
8 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 5111 3.56 17.52 43.45 6.86
Seems to hit PDF attachments really hard and I guess a lot of our
business clients send a lot of PDF's back and forth.
Rick
