On Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 18:57 David Flanigan wrote:
> My secondary MX has only rudimentary anti-spam filtering, and I
> thought SA was assuming it was safe if passed by that server.

It would be safer to turn it off completely. 2nd MX are only useful for 
spammers. What happens when your primary MX fails?

1) If you don't have a 2nd MX, mails are spooled sender side.
2) If you have a 2nd MX, mails are spooled there.

In both cases, your clients/users cannot read their mail or at least not 
send until the primary MX is up again. Before using weak spam 
filtering, get rid of the 2nd and use your energy for the primary.

mfg zmi
-- 
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531                          .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:   "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2  9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                 Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE

Attachment: pgpB9HorWWnHH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to