On Montag, 1. Mai 2006 17:51 Matt Kettler wrote: > Looking at my own current real-world maillogs, BAYES_99 matched 6,643 > messages last week. Of those, only 24 had total scores under 9.0. > (with BAYES_99 scoring 3.5, it would take a message with a total > score of less than 8.5 to drop below the threshold of 5.0 if BAYES_99 > were omitted entirely).
I've looked at a snap of 424 spams these last days, with a total of 8519 points, making about 20 points per SPAM (average). 67 SPAMs are 5-9.99 points, 62 are 10-14.99 points, 294 are >15. So it's those 67 SPAMs that should worry me most - some of them are really just >5 (2 times 5.06 points), and I would like them to score higher, because that's more on the safe side. Unfortunately, I don't have the possibility to check which rules were hit, amavisd-new doesn't log that. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "lynx -source http://zmi.at/zmi3.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: 44A3 C1EC B71E C71A B4C2 9AA6 C818 847C 55CB A4EE // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x55CBA4EE
pgp9gBSLwtFX1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
