Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All that said, I can't see why you'd want to do anything else with DCC. > The FP rate on DCC, even with the defaults of |999999 for fuzz counts, > is significant. In the SA 3.1.0 set3 mass-checks, DCC_CHECK had a S/O > of| 0.979, meaning that 2.1% of email matched by it was nonspam.
Is that with using DCC 'out-of-the-box' or after whitelisting received mailing lists and other regular solicited bulk senders, as recommended by DCC?
