jdow wrote: > >> >> >> BAYES_99, by definition, has a 1% false positive rate. > > That is what Bayes thinks. I think it is closer to something between > 0.5% and 0.1% false positive. I have mine trained down lethally fine > at this point, it appears. > Ok.. Fine, let's take 0.1% FP rate, 10x better than theoretical, but still realistic at some sites.. Even still.. Is that low enough to be worth assigning >5.0 points to?
No.
