On 24-Apr-06, at 9:25 PM, Paul Wetter wrote:
Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
spamassassin -t gives me this:
Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?81.121.100.79>]
3.9 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
They are very different!
Where do we go from here?
Thanks again!!
-Paul
In http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq, <x-tad-bigger>SpamAssassin returns a different score section has more details about what might go wrong
</x-tad-bigger>Vincent
Systems Administrator
Biomedical Research Centre
University of BC
